Which AI meeting assistant does AI recommend overall?
Microsoft leads overall among AI meeting assistants in October 2026, but the race is close. Microsoft has 16.9% share of AI answers, Fathom has 15.3%, and Zoom and Fireflies are tied at 11.7%, so the gap from first to second is only 1.6 points even though Microsoft appears in 74% of answers.
Fathom looks stronger than its rank alone suggests. Fathom has a 92 sentiment score versus Microsoft at 83, and it is named first most often on general buyer questions. Fireflies is also in the mix, with the same 11.7% share as Zoom and a better average position, 3.0 versus 3.3.
Fellow and Granola sit just below the front group. Fellow has 6.8% share of AI answers, the same as Granola, but Fellow's average position is 2.4 and its sentiment score is 98, which keeps it competitive when engines narrow the list.
Do the AI engines agree on the same leader?
Most engines lean toward Microsoft, but they do not agree on a single winner. ChatGPT, Google AI Mode and Google AI Overviews name Microsoft most often at 19.4%, 16.7% and 20%, while Claude puts Fathom first at 17.5% and Gemini puts Fireflies first at 16.7%.
Google AI Overviews is the clearest Microsoft holdout in the data. Google AI Overviews gives Microsoft 20% share of AI answers, with Zoom second at 15% and Fathom third at 12.5%, while ChatGPT keeps Fathom much closer to Microsoft at 17.9% versus 19.4%.
Claude and Gemini widen the spread. Claude lifts Fathom above Microsoft by 3.5 points, while Gemini lifts Fireflies above Microsoft by 1.3 points, which tells buyers that the shortlist is stable but the order still depends on which engine they ask.
Which AI meeting assistant does AI recommend for Microsoft Teams?
Microsoft is the clear pick for Microsoft Teams use, and this is the strongest point of agreement in the data. Microsoft is named in 100% of AI answers on Microsoft Teams assistant questions, far ahead of Fireflies at 44%, Fathom at 41% and Fellow at 31%.
Microsoft pulls further ahead here than it does overall. Microsoft leads the full category with 16.9% share of AI answers, but on Microsoft Teams assistant questions it shows up in every answer, which marks this as a use case where engines stop treating the field as close.
Fireflies and Fathom still appear often enough to matter. Fellow is the quieter contender, yet its 2.4 average position overall suggests engines place it high when they do include it.
Which AI meeting assistant does AI recommend for small business teams?
Fathom is the most common pick for small business teams, but Fellow is the brand AI names first most often. Fathom appears in 100% of AI answers on small business team questions, while Fireflies, Microsoft and Fellow each appear in 75% of answers.
Fellow overperforms on this topic. Fellow is only seventh overall at 6.8% share of AI answers, yet it is the brand most often named first for small business teams, which is a sharper result than its overall rank suggests.
Microsoft stays visible here, but it does not dominate this topic the way it does in Microsoft Teams. Fireflies also holds its ground, matching Microsoft at 75% of answers for this buyer need.
Which AI meeting assistant does AI recommend for recruiting teams?
Zoom is the standout for recruiting teams, even though it ranks behind Microsoft and Fathom overall. Zoom appears in 100% of AI answers on recruiting team questions, while Fathom, Otter and Fellow each appear in 60%, and Metaview is the brand most often named first.
Recruiting changes the order. Zoom is third overall at 11.7% share of AI answers, tied with Fireflies, but on panel interview questions it becomes the most consistently cited option instead of a secondary name.
Metaview is the notable specialist signal in this topic. Metaview does not appear in the overall top 10, yet it is most often named first for recruiting teams, which shows how use case prompts can pull in brands that barely show up in broad comparisons.
What sources do AI answers use for AI meeting assistants?
AI answers on AI meeting assistants lean heavily on brand sites and community content, not on editorial reviews. Brand sources account for 47.3% of citations, community sources account for 10.4%, and editorial and review sources account for 1.7%, as of October 2026.
YouTube is the single most cited site with 36 citations. Read.ai follows with 23, then support.microsoft.com with 21, fireflies.ai with 20, otter.ai with 16 and fellow.ai with 15.
Brand documentation matters most here. Microsoft, Fireflies, Otter and Fellow all appear in the most cited source list, which means a brand that wants to be recommended needs clear public pages that answer buyer questions in plain terms, because those pages are cited far more often than review outlets.
